Critical Strategies and Writing

Analysis

Analysis, the basis of many other strategies, is the process of breaking something into its parts and putting the parts back together so that you can better understand the whole.

When you focus on understanding something better by comparing and contrasting it with something else, you identify and analyze the similarities and differences. As you discuss these in your writing, keep your working thesis with its controlling idea in mind. Let your thesis guide what details you select to establish your criteria for comparison. Your overall purpose in writing this kind of analysis—comparing and contrasting—always guides what you write.

When you seek to explain the causes and effects of an action, event, or situation, you are trying to identify their origins and understand their results. You may discover a chain of events that explain the causes and effects. How you decide where the boundaries of causal analysis are depends on your thesis and your purpose for writing.

Example of Writing Using Analysis

Critical thinking has been defined in a variety of ways for a variety of purposes. In a narrow sense, it means using the strategies of informal logic to analyze and evaluate arguments, expose logical fallacies, and form your own logical arguments that will hold up under the scrutiny of another critical thinker…. But in a wider sense, critical thinking can mean any thinking that is assessed by criteria intended to result in good thinking. Thinking can be shallow, poor, one-sided, self-deceiving, and ego-protecting. Critical thinking means examining your own and others' thinking to be sure that it is good thinking (University of Maryland University College, 1996, pp. 1–4).

 

Analysis can include drawing comparisons, highlighting contrasts, and understanding cause and effect.

 

Student Services: 1616 McCormick Drive, Largo, MD 20774
Mailing Address: 3501 University Blvd. East, Adelphi, MD 20783

Copyright © 2011 University of Maryland University College (UMUC). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without prior written permission of the copyright holder.

All links to external sites were verified at the time of publication. UMUC is not responsible for the validity or integrity of information located at external sites.