Writing Arguments

Steps to Writing an Argument

Determine Your Organization

Classic and Rogerian arguments have organizational structures: frameworks that support their discursive aims. They are presented here.

Suggested Organization for a Classic Argument
  1. Introduction: Give the context and background of your issue. Establish style, tone, and significance of your issue.

  2. State your Case: Clarify your issue here. Provide any necessary background for understanding the issue. Define any important terms or conditions here.

  3. Proposition: State your central proposition. Be sure your hook presents an issue that is open to debate. Present the subtopics or supportive points to forecast your argument for your readers.

  4. Refutation: Analyze the opposition’s argument and summarize it; refute or address the points; identify faulty reasoning and inappropriate appeals.

  5. Substantiation and Proof: Present and develop your own case. Carefully plan your disclosure; avoid logical fallacies. Rely primarily on reasoning for your appeal and use emotional appeals carefully; use examples, facts, experts, and statistics. Develop your argument using the appropriate prose strategy (e.g., causal analysis, comparison, analogies, definitions).

  6. Conclusion: Conclude with conviction. Review your main points and state your claims strongly. Make a compelling plea for action, or invite your readers to refute your argument.

Suggested Organization for a Rogerian Argument
  1. Write a brief objective statement to define the issue.

  2. Analyze and state the opposition’s position in a neutral, objective way. Demonstrate that you understand the opposition’s opinion and their reasons for holding it. Avoid moralizing or judging the opposition’s position or reasons.

  3. Analyze and state your own position in a neutral, objective way. Avoid moralizing about your position or reasons.

  4. Analyze what the two positions have in common; find commonly shared goals and values.

  5. Propose a resolution to the issue that recognizes and incorporates the interests of both positions.

The order of your strongest and weakest points—called the order of disclosure—is important to think about as well. How do we know which order will work? One effective way to order your points is this: start with the second most important point, go to the next points of lesser importance, and then conclude with your strongest point. When you place your two strongest points first and last, you give your important points the two most memorable and emphatic positions, at the beginning and the end of your discussion. When you finish your discussion with the strongest point coming last, you emphasize the strength of your argument and give it punch. This pattern is considered a powerful way to overcome the initial resistance of the readers/audience, although many arguments instead move from the weakest to the strongest points.

Student Services: 1616 McCormick Drive, Largo, MD 20774
Mailing Address: 3501 University Blvd. East, Adelphi, MD 20783

Copyright © 2011 University of Maryland University College (UMUC). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without prior written permission of the copyright holder.

All links to external sites were verified at the time of publication. UMUC is not responsible for the validity or integrity of information located at external sites.