VAIL Virtual Academic Integrity Laboratory UMUC Home
     home  sitemap    
Faculty art (briefcase + computer)
Faculty and Administrators Students
  Tutorials  Guides  Workshops  Survey Research  Policies  AI@UMUC  Links

     
 Introduction  
     
     
 Academic Integrity  
     
  

The Perception & The Problem
  
     
 Academic Dishonesty  
     
     
 Affirming Academic Integrity  
     
     
 References  
     
Academic Integrity and Plagiarism in the Classroom: An Overview

The Perception & The Problem Previous
Previous
Next
Next

Much discussion is taking place in the academic community about academic integrity and unethical academic behavior because of the perception (and perhaps reality) that more unethical academic behavior is taking place on college campuses. There is also the perception that text freely available on the World Wide Web is exacerbating plagiarism since it is quite easy for students to simply cut and paste text. Some also contend that students do not acknowledge the author in Web based information since information on the Web is generally considered commonly held or free. Thus, goes the argument if the information is commonly owned, it must be commonly authored and attribution is not necessary. However, these beliefs are contrary to certain academic standards, not to mention copyright law.

Recent survey studies indicate that Internet plagiarism—where students cut and paste text taken from the Internet without attribution—has increased to 41 percent among college students (McCabe). Students’ unpermitted collaboration at some medium and large institutions increased from 11 percent in a 1963 survey to 49 percent in 1993 (McCabe). And in a 1999 survey, over 75 percent of the college students surveyed admitted to some type of cheating (McCabe). Although some are quick to blame the culture of the Internet as the root of the problem, some scholars note that the shift towards increasing plagiarism has taken place since the 19th century. For example, Simmons states:

My contention is that by the end of the nineteenth century, two discourses about plagiarism and cheating were emerging: the official discourse of professors and textbooks, and the unofficial discourse of students, from student literary magazines and college novels. A comparison of these discourses reveals different models of authorship—the individual model of authorship students were taught in school, and the collaborative and collective model of authorship students practiced through plagiarism (Simmons, 1999).

Although there is disagreement about when unethical student behavior became a problem on campuses, there is agreement that pervasive academic dishonesty is contrary to the core mission of higher education institutions. The Virtual Academic Integrity Laboratory hopes to be a space where students, faculty and administrators can engage in constructive dialogue about the issue and also increase their knowledge and share that knowledge with others on their campuses.

Previous
Previous
Next
Next
 

This project was developed by the Center for Intellectual Property at UMUC. Currently maintained by Information and Library Services.

© 1996-2012 University of Maryland University College
3501 University Blvd. East
Adelphi, Maryland 20783 USA

Contact Us